2013 Election - John Kearney discusses the State of One Nation
John Kearney's latest podcast is now
on Darwin Radio 104.1
One Nation either belongs to its members and supporters
in each state or it is the self serving secret tool of a few.
Which is it to be?
NORTHERN TERRITORY ELECTION REPORT
John Kearney captured 11.9% of the vote in his Humpty Doo booth in the Northern Territory seat of Goyder. In the Casurina Early Voting Centre (EVC) he did 12.5%. Overall John received a divisional total of 8.4%.
He outpolled First Nation Peoples Party candidates in all but one other seat, beat the Greens numbers in all but a couple of seats, out scored most independents and even bettered Labour's tally in at least one seat.
Why is it then the National Secretary of One Nation, Pat Loy, is congratulating the "Indigenous Candidates" presumably the First Nation candidates (another front for Labour) on the national website and failing to even recognise the efforts of a genuine One Nation Western Australia member?
Running under his own name, local identity John Kearney garnered by far the best result for a very very long time for a known One Nation member and supporter. Sadly John was prohibited from running under his true colours as was fellow long time One Nation member, supporter and second candidate Peter Bussa.
Both are out of state members of One Nation Western Australia.
They were supported by WA President Lyn Vickery and Director Brian McRae who flew to Darwin to assist with the campaign at their own expense and with the blessing of the W.A. executive and members.
Peter had only days to prepare, just a hand full of core flutes and how to vote leaflets, one small press advertisement and four minutes on local radio. He scored 2.2% of the vote in a seat where 4158 people voted.
Had the Country Liberal Party Candidate Jo Sangster preferenced Peter and vice versa, and had Peter run as One Nation, she may have beaten the Labour Candidate. A big mistake and a lesson there for the Country Liberals, who foolishly preferenced Labour and for ourselves who were forced to run with one hand tied behind our back!
John Kearney had a longer lead time to prepare and is a regular advocate for One Nation on territory radio. Nevertheless John's budget was limited. He received no party funds and only had private support. Even though he was placed last by both major parties in the preferences, his acceptance by voters was huge as was the One Nation message on the few occassions we could openly spread the word.
"One Nation Policies and One Nation people were welcomed without hesitation in the NT" Lyn Vickery said. "It's a shame we had to fight the election without the help of the party machine. No matter. We've clearly shown that One Nation can rise again. We have proven that our new, never say die, hands on attitude pays big dividends. This result trumps party results in the recent Queensland Election and also in South Australia by a mile. What One Nation members must do now is dump the deadwood from the party, reorganise, back the go ahead people in One Nation in WA, NSW, QLD and the NT and go on the attack in preparation for the next federal election and the Western Australian election due around March 2013."
"One Nation Western Australia welcomes all supporters, former members across the country, and those who want to see the party advance again. We will soon arrive at the magic 500 members number and we will then regain our state and federal registration so that nobody can ever again hold a gun to our heads when it comes to endorsing candidates."
Lyn Vickery congratulated John Kearney and Peter Bussa on an excellent campaign. "When One Nation people want to fight for their country the party is duty bound to encourage them." he said. "Not for a very long time in the history of One Nation have two candidates achieved such a splendid result with so little backing, resources, and time. If the backing had been there we would have easily doubled those figures."
John has decided to now contest the federal election, his third campaign in a row, and calls upon all good One Nation supporters across the country for their help.
Link to NT election results.
Timely comments about the so called "Asylum Seeker" debacle from Cartoonist Pickering ...
28th June 2012
THE PM’S HOLLOW VICTORY:
Malaysia is neither a signatory to the Refugee Convention nor the UNHCR... and there is good reason why.
Malaysia’s record of human abuse rivals China’s. They sell refugee children into prostitution and slavery. When they can’t find buyers in those arenas they are sold to fishermen who can do with them what they will.
More than 100,000 Burmese (latterly Myanmar) refugees, mainly women and children, have fled to Malaysia, escaping decades of military abuse, only to find themselves in an equally parlous state.
Malaysia doesn’t recognise any asylum seeker as a refugee. They classify all as “illegal immigrants” allowing them no rights. Most exist in crowded pens and are afforded no medical assistance. Little wide eyed children are treated like vermin.
This is where your Prime Minister intends to send asylum seekers. This is what brought Joe Hockey to tears. This is what the ALP, and the ALP alone, believes is a decent solution.
Nauru processing would allow Australia to monitor and care for asylum seekers. Regardless of what Gillard says are “special arrangements” in Malaysia, children will not be treated humanely there. Gillard and Chris Bowen both know that.
It was easy for Bowen to negotiate his “deal” with Malaysia because they would love to rid themselves of their “illegal immigrants” and they would love to accept our buckets of borrowed money.
To even consider sending any person, let alone a child, there for processing is nothing short of criminal. The High Court thought the same.
If Gillard was the slightest bit concerned at current drownings she would not have conspired with simpleton Wilkie offering him a Malaysia sunset clause (12-month trial) as an amendment to Oakeshott’s Bill, to ensure her numbers. A sunset clause was available for Nauru but Abbott had no chance to offer it.
Gillard worked hard to get the Oakeshott Bill through the Lower House knowing full well it would never pass the Senate.
She thought it more important to disallow Abbott a nominal win than prevent hundreds more drowning. Gillard’s treachery is nothing short of breathtaking.
The LNP and the Greens are passionately against her Malaysian Solution... and so, justifiably, are many members of Gillard’s own party. That leaves a very thin minority of Parliamentarians that actually agree with Gillard’s disastrous ploy. But we have a very pig-headed woman for a Prime Minister.
Abbott made concessions, Gillard made none.
At 1:05 pm today Abbott called Gillard’s office to inform her of his intention to introduce a private members Bill encompassing all that Gillard wanted except, understandably, Malaysia.
She did not respond, but by 2pm she was in the House craving indulgence to reintroduce Oakeshott’s Bill which required only a third reading and which was essentially the same Malaysian Solution Gillard had proposed. Sleazy Albanese followed her, madly issuing instructions.
When Abbott tried to introduce the Bill he had properly given Gillard notice of, Albanese refused leave for him to do so. Gillard then moved for a third reading of Oakeshott’s Bill. It passed.
What a farce! There is no way in the World that Oakeshott’s Bill will pass the Senate tomorrow, the last sitting day before the winter recess. There was a good chance that Abbott’s Bill would have. So, without a sitting extension, we can sit back and watch hundreds more drown in exchange for Gillard having the satisfaction of sticking it up Abbott.
www.lpickering.net or http://lpickering.net/facebook
AT A GLANCE - ONE NATIONS POLICY ON MIGRATION
"One Nation believes in balanced, zero net immigration (subject to review depending on economic conditions) and that coming to Australia is a privilege that must not be undervalued. As a sovereign people, we reserve the right of discretion in protecting our economy, social cohesion and cultural heritage.
This does NOT mean zero immigration or lack of compassion as the program would admit in the order of 30,000 migrants per annum.
The justification for this policy of not exceeding zero net immigration is that environmentally Australia is near carrying capacity.
From an economic perspective immigration is unsustainable and socially, if continued as is, will lead to increasing ethnic division and tension.
Current policy encourages large numbers of illegal immigrants encourages crime and corruption (the people smuggling industry) and it is time Australia, while recognising the contribution made by migrants in the past, send to the world the message that mass immigration has passed its "use by date".
It is now critical to develop a population policy for Australia and to decide immigration numbers rationally and in the best interest of Australians rather than kow towing to the United Nations.
The immigration policies of the major political parties are disastrous, proceeding as if there were no balance of payments problem, no foreign debt and no geographical or environmental constraints to population growth. If continued, such policies will irreversibly alter our natural and urban environment and economic viability as well as undermining the maintenance and further development of a unique and valuable Australian identity and culture. " For further information on this and other topics visit our MEDIA PAGE.
Drop by and talk to Representatives at our One Nation marquee.
You can meet John Kearney at the Darwin Show ... on 21st to 23rd July.
Sat 8am-2pm. Coolalinga Shopping Centre, Stuart Hwy, Coolalinga, NT
Summary of the Freds Pass Rural Show
A marvelous weekend was had at the show and I could not have wished for a better outcome as the reception that I and the One Nation brand got was terrific.Being there at the Freds Pass Show and representing One Nation certainly put the noses of the major parties right out of whack and I do believe that I had the best political representation at the show.
" The drinks and icy poles went down like a treat" and there was some good old One Nation bantering. About 70-80 membership forms went out. Gave away all my flyers and I've been told by a few people that they intend to help with the distribution of "Vote 1" John Kearney for Goyder flyers in the upcoming Territory elections,... just wonderful!
There was a steady flow of people all weekend long. Lots of families who were genuinely interested in One Nation and I certainly represented us the best I could. People were very friendly and really good natured toward what I was doing and everybody wished me good luck for the upcoming Territory elections at the end of August and also said they were going to vote for me, which was just an amazing feeling. I feel very humbled by people's attitude not only toward me but also toward One Nation. I am extremely proud to represent a party that I and all others call family.
One lady with 3 little kids called me "the rose between 2 thorns" and said, like many others, they will never vote for the major parties again as long as One Nation existed. Quite awe inspiring stuff.
The angst in the community that's totally pointed at the major parties is something to see.
I thought I had a really good scope on how people are feeling right now, how wrong was I. The whole feeling of anger toward these major parties is simmering on the edge of explosion and people are just totally fed up with all the deceitful lies and the dirty tricks played by a mob of what they see as "crooks".
One Nation has also now been invited to display its wares at the Coolalinga Markets. Being seen there and helping with the Coolalinga Markets for the committee puts us in a very good light with the community and gives people a better reason to vote for One Nation at the upcoming Territory elections.
"From Little Things Big Things Grow". See you at the Coolalinga Markets. By John Kearney.
Drop by and talk to Representatives at our One Nation marquee.
Rosa Lee Long Becomes Mayor of Tablelands Regional Council
FORMER One Nation MP Rosa Lee Long looks set to return to the political arena, this time as mayor of the Tablelands Regional Council.
Mrs Lee Long holds a strong lead over incumbent Tom Gilmore in the early counting. Votes in the Tablelands electorate have been lodged only by postal voting this year.
Mrs Lee Long, who served three consecutive terms for One Nation in state parliament between 2001 and 2009, holds 62 per cent of the contest with about 10,317 votes, Tom Gilmore has 6542 votes or 38 per cent. Full Story HERE
COMMENT: Congratulations from all One Nation supporters in Western Australia, The Northern Territory – indeed across Australia! A job well done and proof that when well represented the values of One Nation are alive and well! Lyn Vickery – State President One Nation W.A.
“We Care! We Listen! We Serve!
CLIMATE CHANGE - LET'S SET A FEW THINGS STRAIGHT
A FUTURE VISION for the Northern Territory in which Government offers strong and enduring incentives to city and regional business and their communities to grow existing towns into viable and sustainable new regional centers.
A policy where the requirements of local communities are always addressed ahead of foreign aid, immigrants, asylum seekers and the affairs of minorities.
An ECONOMY based on incentives for all. A fair reward for an honest day’s work. Drastically reduced red tape. Predictability and sound, balanced, economic planning.
A firm focus on HEALTH AND DENTAL EXPENDITURE. Genuine health care, rather than bureaucracy or the state v federal squabble.
To create completely unique and affordable HOME OWNERSHIP options for all Territorians.
To fight and preserve FREEDOM OF SPEECH and end POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and the failed experiment of MULTICULTURALISM which divides Australians into toxic warring tribes and harms our children.
To rid our schools of the poison of left wing political interference, political correctness and multi-culturalism. To pursue pathways to excellence in our children’s education.
To reward PENSIONERS with a wide range of new financial and other benefits befitting their status as senior citizens. These will include relaxing income earning capacity and reducing tax.
To stop the IMMIGRATION FARCE whereby citizens are created via the backdoor path of student entry, permanent residency and easy citizenship. Entry of family members will also be closely regulated.
To firmly stamp “temporary” on TEMPORARY VISAS and block this pathway to backdoor citizenship, while also limiting the right of appeal.
* FOREIGN DOMINATION of AUSTRALIAN COMPANIES
* CUTS to NATIONAL DEFENCE and BORDER PROTECTION.
* RADICAL ISLAMISTS and SHARIA RELIGIOUS LAW - in any form.
* The DUMPING of cheap foreign JUNK PRODUCTS on the
Australian Market and the removal of STANDARDS TESTING
* False and AMBIGUOUS FOOD LABELLING.
* The growing of GMO and IMPORTATION OF INFERIOR and GMO
Dr David Evans' address in Perth. Climate change?
See VIDEO HERE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Di5FyndJbz0
Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen.
The debate about global warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro thin half-truths and misunderstandings.
I am a scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, I understand the evidence, I was once an alarmist, but I am now a sceptic.
Watching this issue unfold has been amusing but, lately, worrying. This issue is tearing society apart, making fools and liars out of our politicians.
Let's set a few things straight.
The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess which was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s. But the gravy train was too big, with too many jobs, industries, trading profits, political careers, and the possibility of world government and total control riding on the outcome.
So rather than admit they were wrong, the governments, and their tame climate scientists, now cheat and lie outrageously to maintain the fiction about carbon dioxide being a dangerous pollutant.
Let's be perfectly clear. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, and other things being equal, the more carbon dioxide in the air, the warmer the planet. Every bit of carbon dioxide that we emit warms the planet. But the issue is not whether carbon dioxide warms the planet, but how much.
Most scientists, on both sides, also agree on how much a given increase in the level of carbon dioxide raises the planet's temperature, if just the extra carbon dioxide is considered. These calculations come from laboratory experiments; the basic physics have been well known for a century.
The disagreement comes about what happens next.
The planet reacts to the extra carbon dioxide, which changes everything.
Most critically, the extra warmth causes more water to evaporate from the oceans. But does the water hang around and increase the height of moist air in the atmosphere, or does it simply create more clouds and rain? Back in 1980, when the carbon dioxide theory started, no one knew.
The alarmists guessed that it would increase the height of moist air around the planet, which would warm the planet even further, because the moist air is also a greenhouse gas.
This is the core idea of every official climate model: for each bit of warming due to carbon dioxide, they claim it ends up causing three bits of warming due to the extra moist air. The climate models amplify the carbon dioxide warming by a factor of three - so two thirds of their projected warming is due to extra moist air (and other factors), only one third is due to extra carbon dioxide.
I'll bet you didn't know that. Hardly anyone in the public does, but it's the core of the issue. All the disagreements, lies, and misunderstanding spring from this. The alarmist case is based on this guess about moisture in the atmosphere, and there is simply no evidence for the amplification that is at the core of their alarmism.
Which is why the alarmists keep so quiet about it and you've never heard of it before. And it tells you what a poor job the media have done in covering this issue.
Weather balloons had been measuring the atmosphere since the 1960s, many thousands of them every year. The climate models all predict that as the planet warms, a hot-spot of moist air will develop over the tropics about 10km up, as the layer of moist air expands upwards into the cool dry air above.
During the warming of the late 1970s, 80s, and 90s, the weather balloons found no hot-spot. None at all. Not even a small one. This evidence proves the climate models are fundamentally flawed and they greatly overestimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide.This evidence first became clear around the mid-1990s.
At this point official "climate science" stopped being a science.
You see, in science empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up, and instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory - this just happens to keep them in high-paying jobs with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters.
There are now several independent pieces of evidence showing that the earth responds to the warming due to extra carbon dioxide by dampening the warming. Every long-lived natural system behaves this way, counteracting any disturbances, otherwise the system would be unstable.
The climate system is no exception, and now we can prove it.
But the alarmists say the exact opposite, that the climate system amplifies any warming due to extra carbon dioxide, and is potentially unstable. Surprise - surprise, their predictions of planetary temperature made in 1988 to the US Congress, and again in 1990, 1995, and 2001, have all proved much higher than reality.
They keep lowering the temperature increases they expect, from 0.30C per decade in 1990, to 0.20C per decade in 2001, and now 0.15C per decade - yet they have the gall to tell us "it's worse than expected". These people are not scientists.
They over-estimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide, selectively deny evidence, and now they cheat and lie to conceal the truth.
One way they cheat is in the way they measure temperature.
The official thermometers are often located in the warm exhaust of air conditioning outlets, over hot tarmac at airports where they get blasts of hot air from jet engines, at wastewater plants where they get warmth from decomposing sewerage, or in hot cities choked with cars and buildings. Global warming is measured in tenths of a degree, so any extra heating nudge is important. In the US, nearly 90% of official thermometers surveyed by volunteers violate official siting requirements that they not be too close to an artificial heating source.
The photos of these thermometers are on the Internet; you can get to them via the corruption paper at my site, sciencespeak.com. Look at the photos, and you'll never trust a government climate scientist again.
They place their thermometers in warm localities, and call the results "global" warming. Anyone can understand that this is cheating. They say that 2010 is the warmest recent year, but it was only the warmest at various airports, selected air conditioners, and certain car parks.
Global temperature is also measured by satellites, which measure nearly the whole planet 24/7without bias. The satellites say the hottest recent year was 1998, and that since 2001 the global temperature has levelled off.
So it's a question of trust.
If it really is warming up as the government climate scientists say, why do they present only the surface thermometer results and not mention the satellite results? And why do they put their thermometers near artificial heating sources? This is so obviously a scam now.
So what is really going on with the climate?
The earth has been in a warming trend since the depth of the Little Ice Age around 1680. Human emissions of carbon dioxide were negligible before 1850 and have nearly all come after WWII, so human carbon dioxide cannot possibly have caused the trend. Within the trend, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation causes alternating global warming and cooling for 25 - 30 years at a go in each direction. We have just finished a warming phase, so expect mild global cooling for the next two decades.
We are now at an extraordinary juncture.
Official climate science, which is funded and directed entirely by government, promotes a theory which is based on a guess about moist air and is now a known falsehood. Governments gleefully accept their advice, because the only way to curb emissions is to impose taxes and extend government control over all energy use. And to curb emissions on a world scale might even lead to world government - how exciting for the political class!
A carbon tax?
Even if Australia stopped emitting all carbon dioxide tomorrow, completely shut up shop and went back to the stone age, according to the official government climate models it would be cooler in 2050 by about 0.015 degrees. But their models exaggerate tenfold - in fact our sacrifices would make the planet in 2050 a mere 0.0015 degrees cooler!
Sorry, but you've been had.
Finally, to those of you who still believe the planet is in danger from our carbon dioxide emissions: sorry, but you've been had. Yes carbon dioxide is a cause of global warming, but it's so minor it's not worth doing much about.
Dr David Evans consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010, modelling Australia's carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products. Evans is a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees including a PhD from Stanford University in electrical engineering. The area of human endeavour with the most experience and sophistication in dealing with feedbacks and analysing complex systems is electrical engineering, and the most crucial and disputed aspects of understanding the climate system are the feedbacks. The evidence supporting the idea that CO2 emissions were the main cause of global warming reversed itself from 1998 to 2006, causing Evans to move from being a warmist to a sceptic..
IT PAYS TO CHECK OUT TIM FLANNERY'S PREDICTIONS ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
TIM Flannery has just been hired by the Gillard Government to scare us stupid, and I can't think of a better man for the job.
This Alarmist of the Year is worth every bit of the $180,000 salary he'll get as part-time chairman of the Government's new Climate Commission.
His job is simple: to advise us that we really, truly have to accept, say, the new tax on carbon dioxide emissions that this Government threatens to impose.
This kind of work is just up the dark alley of Flannery, author of The Weather Makers, that bible of booga booga.
He's had years of practice trying to terrify us into thinking our exhausts are turning the world into a fireball that will wipe out civilisation, melt polar ice caps and drown entire cities under hot seas.
Small problem, though: after so many years of hearing Flannery's predictions, we're now able to see if some of the scariest have actually panned out.
Find Out HERE
Count the lies in this one still from the ad in which Michael Caton and Cate Blanchett tell us to say “yes” to Julia Gillard’s carbon dioxide tax:
- No, our skies aren’t black with soot.
- No, this tax won’t clear the skies.
- No, this isn’t about carbon but carbon dioxide.
- No, that power station isn’t in Australia, but Britain.
- No, it won’t be closed by Gillard’s tax, not least because it’s closed already.
- No, not one power station in this country pumps out black soot like this.
How can such a lying ad by show by people demanding we “respect the science”?
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Lies, Lies and more Lies
To all those people who have seen part of the Government’s $13.7 Million Dollars advertising campaign to convince the Australian population to accept a new tax on carbon, the so-called polluting element in the atmosphere.
It has been well established that the first television advertisement with Michael Caton standing in front of black soot coming from a power plant was in fact, taken in England many years ago and that plant is NOT operating now. I am surprised that a man of his status should allow himself to be used in this disgraceful way by the Government.
Nowhere in Australia will you see a scene such as this! What we have in Australia is steam coming out of our chimneys - not black soot.
How can anyone take notice of any ads such as this, when the very first one is proven false?
No wonder Politicians are right on the bottom of the list of those who can be trusted in Australia. Lies, Lies and More Lies.
Wheat and Sheep Farmer Newdegate
Letter from a Concerned Australian
By Terence Cardwell
I have sat by for a number of years frustrated at the rubbish being put forth about carbon dioxide emissions, thermal coal fired power stations and renewable energy and the ridiculous Emissions Trading Scheme.
Frustration at the lies told (particularly during the election) about global pollution. Using Power Station cooling towers for an example. The condensation coming from those cooling towers is as pure as that that comes out of any kettle.
Frustration about the so called incorrectly named man made 'carbon emissions' which of course is Carbon Dioxide emissions and what it is supposedly doing to our planet.
Frustration about the lies told about renewable energy and the deliberate distortion of renewable energy and its ability to replace fossil fuel energy generation. And frustration at the ridiculous carbon credit programme which is beyond comprehension.
And further frustration at some members of the public who have not got a clue about thermal Power Stations or Renewable Energy. Quoting ridiculous figures about something they clearly have little or no knowledge of.
First coal fired power stations do NOT send 60 to 70% of the energy up the chimney. The boilers of modern power station are 96% efficient and the exhaust heat is captured by the economisers and reheaters that heat the air and water before entering the boilers.
The very slight amount exiting the stack is moist as in condensation and CO2. There is virtually no fly ash because this is removed by the precipitators or bagging plant that are 99.98% efficient. The 4% lost is heat through boiler wall convection.
Coal fired Power Stations are highly efficient with very little heat loss and can generate massive amount of energy for our needs. They can generate power at efficiency of less than 10,000 b.t.u. per kilowatt and cost wise that is very low.
The percentage cost of mining and freight is very low. The total cost of fuel is 8% of total generation cost and does NOT constitute a major production cost.
As for being laughed out of the country, China is building multitudes of coal fired power stations because they are the most efficient for bulk power generation.
We have, like, the USA, coal fired power stations because we HAVE the raw materials and are VERY fortunate to have them. Believe me no one is laughing at Australia - exactly the reverse, they are very envious of our raw materials and independence.
The major percentage of power in Europe and U.K. is nuclear because they don't have the coal supply for the future.
Yes it would be very nice to have clean, quiet, cheap energy in bulk supply. Everyone agrees that it would be ideal. You don't have to be a genius to work that out. But there is only one problem---It doesn't exist.
Yes - there are wind and solar generators being built all over the world but they only add a small amount to the overall power demand.
The maximum size wind generator is 3 Megawatts, which can rarely be attained on a continuous basis because it requires substantial forces of wind. And for the same reason only generate when there is sufficient wind to drive them. This of course depends where they are located but usually they only run for 45% -65% of the time, mostly well below maximum capacity. They cannot be relied for a 'base load' because they are too variable. And they certainly could not be used for load control.
The peak load demand for electricity in Australia is approximately 50,000 Megawatts and only small part of this comes from the Snowy Hydro Electric System (The ultimate power Generation) because it is only available when water is there from snow melt or rain. And yes they can pump it back but it cost to do that. (Long Story).
Tasmania is very fortunate in that they have mostly hydro electric generation because of their high amounts of snow and rainfall. They also have wind generators (located in the roaring forties) but that is only a small amount of total power generated.
Based on a average generating output of 1.5 megawatts (of unreliable power) you would require over 33,300 wind generators.
As for solar power generation much research has been done over the decades and there are two types. Solar thermal generation and Solar Electric generation but in each case they cannot generate large amounts of electricity.
Any clean, cheap energy is obviously welcomed but they would NEVER have the capability of replacing Thermal power generation. So get your heads out of the clouds, do some basic mathematics and look at the facts not going off with the fairies (or some would say the extreme greenies.)
We are all greenies in one form or another and care very much about our planet. The difference is most of us are realistic. Not in some idyllic utopia where everything can be made perfect by standing around holding a banner and being a general pain in the backside.
Here are some facts that will show how ridiculous this financial madness the government is following. Do the simple maths and see for yourselves.
According to the 'believers' the CO2 in air has risen from .034% to .038% in air over the last 50 years.
To put the percentage of Carbon Dioxide in air in a clearer perspective;
If you had a room 12 ft x 12 ft x 7 ft or 3.7 mtrs x 3.7 mtrs x 2.1 mtrs, the area carbon dioxide would occupy in that room would be .25m x .25m x .17m or the size of a large packet of cereal.
Australia emits 1% of the world's total carbon Dioxide and the government wants to reduce this by 20%t or reduce emissions by 0.2 % of the world's total CO2 emissions.
What effect will this have on existing CO2 levels?
By their own figures they state the CO2 in air has risen from .034% to .038% in 50 years.
Assuming this is correct, the world CO2 has increased in 50 years by .004%.
Per year that is .004 divided by 50 = .00008%. (Getting confusing -but stay with me).
Of that because we only contribute 1% our emissions would cause CO2 to rise .00008 divided by 100 = .0000008%.
Of that 1%, we supposedly emit, the governments wants to reduce it by 20% which is 1/5th of .0000008 = .00000016% effect per year they would have on the world CO2 emissions based on their own figures.
That would equate to a area in the same room, as the size of a small pin.!!!
For that they have gone crazy with the ridiculous trading schemes, Solar and roofing installations, Clean coal technology. Renewable energy, etc, etc.
How ridiculous it that.
The cost to the general public and industry will be enormous. Cripple and even closing some smaller business.
WHAT DOES A HUNG PARLIAMENT MEAN CONSTITUTIONALLY?
The potential of a hung parliament in Australia, following yesterday's election, has raised questions about the constitutional situation.
The final decision of how many seats each party has will probably not be known for some days but, once all results are in, if it is found that no one party has a clear majority, negotiations will commence with the Green and independent members to enlist their support.
The Governor-General is vested with constitutional powers to commission a person to form a government but, by convention, these are never used in an arbitrary sense.
The duty of the Governor-General is to commission the leader of the party which can prove it has sufficient support in the lower house of the parliament to survive a vote of no confidence. Until then, the incumbent government continues in caretaker mode.
If, in the future, those independents who had pledged support, decide to withdraw and support the other party, then the Governor-General will, upon being certain that the other party would survive a vote in the House of Representatives, commission the leader of that party to form a government. If the situation is likely to continue to be unstable, then the
Governor-General will seek a consensus on holding an election.
The number of electoral votes gained by any one party is, in a constitutional sense, immaterial - although it may influence the non-aligned members. It is all about votes of elected members in the House of Representatives.
The whole process is based on providing the country with the most stable government possible.
Courtesy Philip Benwell (Aust Monarchists League)
AN OPINION PIECE
20th Aug 2013
As current candidates for the Senate or House of Reps for One Nation, you have as I understand it paid a fee of $2000 or $1000 respectively.
I have no doubt that most of you see One Nation in terms of what it espouses. Most of you would see as I did back in 1996 and realise that the two party duopoly needs to be broken.
Pauline Hanson who most of you see as the Patron Saint of One Nation is anything but. She is now no more than a catalyst to fill the depleted coffers of a now questionable team.
The question that none of you have asked because you are unaware of its history, is, is it genuine? To answer these questions read the links HERE
#Note: Bruce Whiteside was the driving force behind the original Pauline Hanson Support Movement which eventually morphed under Ettridge Oldfield and Hanson into One Nation in 1997.
The above letter should be taken in conjunction with the above Darwin Radio 104.1 fm podcast by John Kearney.
NT open for business!
W.A. Member John Kearney and a robust group of patriotic territorians are working together to push the name of One Nation, right here in the Northern Territory.
Members are here to serve and will fight for the rights and issues Territorians find most important.
Sponsored and supported by One Nation W.A. this new group is determined to put members in the N.T. Parliament at the coming elections.
If you care about the Northern Territory your kids future and what the Labour and Liberal parties have done to wreck Australia, then do something about it - JOIN ONE NATION NOW - CLICK HERE.
Islamic Sharia Law Showdown in Brussles - Belgium
New Breaking media news items are on our media page HERE
Palin and Pauline - two P's in a pod.
The Melbourne Age broke the news!
Sarah Palin's Campaign Bus
One Nation, the party Pauline Hanson created, just dramatically raised the stakes in Australian politics when Northern Territory member John Kearney joined in discussions about "down under" politics in Richmond Virginia with American political dynamo Sarah Palin. Ms Palin is the former governor of Alaska and a vice presidential candidate in the 2008 US elections.
According to Mr Kearney, Ms Palin showed great interest in Australian politics and showed admiration for fellow firebrand Pauline Hanson.
Party spokespersons claim Pauline Hanson even influenced Ms Palin launching her very successful same name US "One Nation" campaign tour - see bus.
One Nation in Australia is actively seeking to foster links with like minded parties, groups and political leaders around the world. Their aim is to widen the party's interest and information base and gain from recent overseas electoral successes by the right wing groups, particularly across Europe. "The pendulum has begun to swing sharply to the right all around the whole world and One Nation here is growing fast with new members joining each day." said Richard Putral, President of One Nation in NSW.
One Nation aims to tap into Palin's push to ''educate and energise Americans about our nation's founding principles''.
"Australian's can learn something here," said Mr Putral. "Ms Gillard has lost the plot. We must also get back to our founding principles and bury the recent ideological multicultural and political correctness rubbish of Labour, the Greens and even the Liberals. If we don't, then we can kiss our children's futures goodbye. What big business seems to want, is an Indo Asian Australia with an underpaid workforce and a population of forty million consumers crammed on top of each other on an arid, depleted continent. That's not going to happen. One Nation has a far better vision for the Australian people. One born out of respect for who and what we are and where we came from. One aimed at securing our children's future in a turbulent dog eat dog world. One Nation is on the move."
Link to Melbourne Age Story HERE
Prepare for a New Flood of Middle Eastern Asylum Seekers
As the Middle East crumbles into chaos and anarchy caused mainly by rising food prices, explosive population growth, corruption and religious pressure the West can expect a flood of asylum seekers.
Already the first boats have arrived in nearby Italy and they are loaded with thousands who are seeking the attractions of "Paradise Europe". Most are Moroccan Muslims fleeing the hunger and hardship that will soon grip their homeland even harder than before the overthrow of their despotic leader. So much for "freedom".
Thousands more have already fled Egypt. Those who can afford a flight cram the airports in Cairo or jostle for any ferry that will carry them away from the nightmare to which they in many ways contributed by simply being apathetic toward the region's growing problems.
In Libya the air terminal is a chaotic sea of panic stricken humanity.
Meamwhile, the zombie western media would have us believe that this is a "democratic" uprising of the people aided by tweeters and young computer literate activists.
Clearly that is rubbish. An empty stomach and no apparent hope for a better life in their own homelands are the real drivers of this revolution.
Already on the receiving end of this calamity, Western Nations will need compassion and clear thinking in dealing with this fresh humanitarian disaster.
We will need to sort out the genuine refugees from those who are in fact former thugs and operatives from the regimes that have just fallen.
Already Europe is reeling from a decades long tidal wave of Islamic and other asylum seekers and gate crashers.
The house is full. The leaders of France, Germany, Britain and Holland have all recently pointed to the fact that the grand "multicultural" experiment has failed miserably. Already they are wrestling with Muslim ghettos and huge unemployment within these immigrant communities. Acknowledged, at last, is the fact that these people often simply don't integrate.
What will hundreds more asylum seekers do to the patience of Western leaders who are already being prodded by their electorates to fix this problem?
Interesting times are ahead.
MULTICULTURALISM HAS FAILED
BERLIN (AFP) – Germany's attempt to create a multi-cultural society has failed completely, Chancellor Angela Merkel said at the weekend, calling on the country's immigrants to learn German and adopt Christian values.
Merkel weighed in for the first time in a blistering debate sparked by a central bank board member saying the country was being made "more stupid" by poorly educated and unproductive Muslim migrants.
"Multikulti", the concept that "we are now living side by side and are happy about it," does not work, Merkel told a meeting of younger members of her conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party at Potsdam near Berlin.
"This approach has failed, totally," she said, adding that immigrants should integrate and adopt Germany's culture and values.
"We feel tied to Christian values. Those who don't accept them don't have a place here," said the chancellor. Full Story HERE
Migrant Population on Track to Hit 400 Million
MADRID, Nov 29, 2010 (IPS) - The population of migrants worldwide could rise above 400 million by 2050 if present rates of growth continue, says a report by the International Organisation for Migration released Monday.
The report says that "if the number of international migrants, estimated at 214 million in 2010, continues to grow at the same pace as during the last 20 years, it could reach 405 million by 2050."
"The world itself is becoming a hotspot for migration," Peter Schatzer, chief of staff of the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), told IPS. "It's no longer the traditional migration routes to Europe and the U.S. alone that will see pressure. Now the emerging economic powers also attract migration, such as Brazil, South Africa, India, China."
Governments everywhere are ill prepared to deal with the new migration explosion, Schatzer cautioned. Full Story HERE
Is Julia Gillard validly a Member of Parliament?
On the 23rd June 1999 the High Court ruled that Heather Hill could not validly hold the seat in the Australian Senate to which she was elected. Mrs Hill was born in the United Kingdom on the 9th August 1960. Under British law, birth in Britain normally confers U.K. citizenship. British citizenship ceases on registration of a declaration of renunciation.
Mrs Hill became an Australian Citizen and pledged her "loyalty to Australia and its people, who democratic beliefs I share, whose rights and liberties I respect, and whose laws I will uphold and obey". She applied for and obtained and used an Australian passport. At the time of her election to the Senate no renunciation of British Citizenship by Mrs Hill had been registered.
The problem for Mrs Hill was that section 44 of the Australian Constitution declares that a person holding citizenship or rights of citizenship in a foreign country (including UK) is ineligible to be a member of the Senate or House of Representatives. The fact that Mrs Hill was an Australian citizen was not in doubt. The issue was whether she could hold dual citizenship, to which the High Court answered "no".
The question is : "Has Julia Gillard renounced British citizenship in proper form and has the renunciation been registered?"
In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: Who lost Europe?
Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots... Full Story HERE
A WARNING FLAG FOR AUSTRALIA!
Third World Immigrants Import Unemployment, New Study Confirms
Third World immigrants into Britain are responsible for the overwhelming majority of unemployed benefit seekers in many areas, a new study has shown.
The figures, which confirm the intolerable burden which immigration has placed on the benefits system in Britain, mirrors the situation in other European countries such as the Netherlands where 60 percent of benefits users are Third World immigrants.
According to the new report, issued by MigrationwatchUK, the “relationship between immigration and youth unemployment is positive and significant in those areas that have experienced the highest rates of immigration.”
Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of Migrationwatch UK, said in a press release that "People have tiptoed around this issue for far too long. Many factors contribute to youth unemployment but this research suggests that immigration is a significant factor.”
The report said that “youth unemployment is an important and growing social and economic problem.
“Unemployment of 18 – 24 year olds is currently running at more than twice the overall unemployment rate (17.5 percent compared with 7.8 percent), with 724,000 unemployed. A quarter of young people without a job have been unemployed for more than 12 months.
“The employment rate for young people is also strikingly lower (at 59 percent) than the overall rate of employment.”
The Migrationwatch report then quoted from the April 2008 House of Lords report on the economic impacts of immigration which said that “youth unemployment has increased by about 100,000 since early 2004 and the participation rate has dropped from 69.4 percent to 67.4 percent.”
In other words, the empirical evidence is clear: large numbers of Third World immigrants are not “contributing to economic activity” or “keeping the welfare state afloat through taxes” but are in fact making the problem worse. Link HERE
Other evidence of the impact of Third World immigration in London can be found in the book The Immigration Invasion.
In the chapter dealing with Britain, that book reports: “Unemployment in inner London is almost twice the national average — 7.1 percent compared with 3.6 percent in the UK. In addition, some 42.1 percent of children in inner London are eligible for free school meals. This compares with an average of 15.8 percent of children nationally.
“In December 2001, 10 of the 25 Parliamentary constituencies with the highest unemployment rates in the UK were in London. London is, says the Association of London Government, home to more unemployed people than any other region in the UK and more than the combined total of Scotland and Wales.
“According to a report released by the office of the mayor of London in November 2002, more than half the 600,000 children living in inner London are being brought up below the government’s official poverty line.
“According to this report, 30 percent of inner London’s working age adults are already below the poverty line. The mayor of London’s own report on poverty in the capital points out that poverty is highest among ethnic minority groups, with 73 percent of Pakistani and Bangladeshi children and 55 percent of black children living in poverty after housing costs.”
The Truth about Pensions… and the Lies of our Leaders
Nick Minchin on the Tony Jones ABC TV Program Q & A 11/09/2008 stated quite clearly that funds were not, have not and are not collected and held in a bank account waiting for the government to pay it out in the form of the Old Age Pension, or words that meant, “exactly that.”
As an ex Australian Federal Government finance Minister, now shadow defence minister, this man knows that his statement on that television program, was a blatant lie. Full Story HERE
FACTS AND FIGURES EVERY AUSTRALIAN SHOULD KNOW!
Based upon statements and figures provided by the Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Citizenship.
This document provides facts and figures from the Department’s own website and shows how deeply Australia is now sunk in the third world overpopulation, corruption, global migration whirlpool.
Horrifying as it may seem, everything you read here is a consequence of the failed policies and wrong headed actions of previous governments, both Labor and Liberal.
The entire immigration, refugee and asylum seeker shambles is a result of prior Australian governments failing to consult with the people and do their will and also not fully considering the consequences of signing the agreements and international treaties that now bind us hand and foot.If previous governments had simply consulted with the Australian people, then our nation would be a far happier and less tension ridden place. Now, both the Labor and Liberal parties find themselves in a world of grief. Full Story HERE
A Call to All Patriots to help
stop the destruction of Australia
And how can man die better Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his gods,…" Lays of Ancient Rome - Horatius.
How Indeed? The very foundations of OUR Australia are shaking under the weight of a flood of foreigners.
Once the problem was just Asia, now they flood in from every nation and failed society on earth.
An entire industry of graft and corruption has grown up as more and more of these people drain the vitals of Australia - a silent cancer growing within.
Leaky boats are just a small part of this invasion - a media diversion. Stand at any international airport entry gate at any time day or night when overseas flights arrive and you will see the appalling flood at its full tide.
Hundreds target Australia as a paradise to be pillaged through our generous health and social security systems and lax tracking of foreigners within our borders. Even more slide in on temporary work visas or as "students" - many have the sole aim of dodging or exploiting the system and staying.
How will One Nation attack these problems? More HERE
Charleton Heston - "From my cold dead hands!"
Bring Our Troops Home
A Letter to One Nation
Bring the troop’s home and let the Afghans and Iraq's sought their mess out themselves. Stop being the lapdog to the U.S.A,. Let them implode themselves under the socialism of Barak Obama.
We Australians should be very concerned with the threat which will come from our north, not the security of nations we have nothing in common or require to deal with.
Full Letter HERE
What Exactly does a Billion Dollars
look like?The next time you hear a politician use the Word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about whether you want the 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money.
A billion is a difficult number to comprehend, but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of its press releases.A.
A billion seconds ago it was 1959.
A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.
A billion hours ago our ancestors were
Living in the Stone Age.
A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.
A billion dollars ago was only
13 hours and 12 minutes,
At the rate the Gillard government
is spending it!
Will Labor raise the GST?
Julia Gillard's knifing of Kevin Rudd shows without doubt that Labor will do anything to retain power in Canberra.
As much as we abhorred Rudd's policies, we can have sympathy with the way he was treated and then that compounded by being refused inclusion on the front bench.
Again, Labor shows a complete lack of loyalty toward their own. So how much loyalty do you think they have for the public, for those who voted them in?
Only the PARTY reigns supreme with Labor's power brokers, and obviously Gillard.
Now watch for her announcement of a rise in GST to replace Rudd's other failed tax increases!
UK VAT 17.5% EU VAT 17% Greece VAT 23%
How long will Julia Gillard resist?
Twenty seven taxes and counting...
Today we pay tax on top of tax. From the ubiquitous GST to payrol tax and the big new mining slug. The list was to big to put in this column.
Yet, not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago. And our nation was one of the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt...
We had the largest middle class in the world...
And Mum stayed home to raise the kids.
What happened? Find out more FULL STORY
Lord Monckton Questions Global Warming Science - Copenhagen.
The Climate Change Hoax
A large Collection of excellent You Tubes.
Islamist sickness. The Islamist Curse on Britain’s Streets.
A shocking video has emerged on YouTube which spells out more clearly than any article could do of the threat which the Islamist/UAF/far left gangster alliance poses to the future of Britain.
More You Tubes on
One Nation Supports Clean Energy
"Democracy allows us to make up our own minds.
Bureaucracy prevents us from sharing our thoughts.
Dictatorship controls our minds, thoughts and everything else.
Beware, the world is changing !"
You can email One Nation Northern Territory Branch right here
© 2012, One Nation Northern Territory Branch
Website prepared and content authorised by Mr Lyn Vickery, State President One Nation Western Australia Ph 08 8988 2552
(Disclaimer : The views expressed in the One Nation (N.T. Branch) web site are the views of the individual contributors and are not necessarily the views of the Web Manager, or of the Executive Members
or Members of the One Nation Party. While every effort is made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this web site no responsibility or liability is accepted by the One Nation Party (N.T. Branch)
for errors or omissions)